The two present group puzzles are aimed at philosophy students in upper school. In a first phase, the students should devote themselves to comparing human rights with indigenous rights. For this purpose, they work out parts of the indigenous rights in individual work and present them to their expert groups (three people, working the same way). A joint learning product is then created in the group of experts, which is to be presented in the plenary session. Now the students switch to their core groups (three people each who have previously worked on different topics). As a material you will receive the summary of human rights, which should now be compared by the groups with the results on the subject of indigenous rights.
In a second development round, work should also be done in the sense of a group puzzle. The students work out the disadvantages of indigenous people in a shared workload. In their expert groups (three people, equivalent work) they present their results and assess whether the UN Charter of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is suitable for counteracting this disadvantage. Then you switch to the main groups, in which the individual results are now viewed together.
Weniger